Map Snapshot
2 Records
Seasonality Snapshot
No images available
Source: Wikipedia
Coenogonium pineti | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Fungi |
Division: | Ascomycota |
Class: | Lecanoromycetes |
Order: | Gyalectales |
Family: | Coenogoniaceae |
Genus: | Coenogonium |
Species: | C. pineti
|
Binomial name | |
Coenogonium pineti | |
Synonyms[1] | |
List
|
Coenogonium pineti is a species of crustose lichen in the family Coenogoniaceae. It was first formally described by Erik Acharius in 1810, as Lecidea pineti.[2] Robert Lücking and H. Thorsten Lumbsch transferred it to Coenogonium in 2004 after molecular phylogenetic analysis suggested its placement in that genus. The lichen has a widespread distribution in cooler, temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere, but has also been recorded from southeastern mainland Australia and Tasmania.[3]
Although usually found growing on bark, Coenogonium pineti has also been found growing on mosses. Its thallus is smooth, greyish-green to greenish-black in colour, and lacks a prothallus; it measures 5–20 mm (0.2–0.8 in) in diameter. The apothecia are small (0.2–0.5 mm in diameter) and pale with a wide margin. Ascospores are ellipsoid with a single septum, measuring 9–14 by 2.3–4.5 μm.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ "Synonymy. Current Name: Coenogonium pineti (Ach.) Lücking & Lumbsch, in Lücking, Stuart & Lumbsch, Mycologia 96(2): 290 (2004)". Species Fungorum. Retrieved 21 June 2022.
- ^ Acharius, Erik (1810). Lichenographia Universalis (in Latin). Gottingen: Apud Iust. Frid. Danckwerts. p. 195.
- ^ Lücking, Robert; Stuart, Bryan L.; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten (2004). "Phylogenetic relationships of Gomphillaceae and Asterothyriaceae: evidence from a combined Bayesian analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences". Mycologia. 96 (2): 283–294. doi:10.1080/15572536.2005.11832978.
- ^ Wu, Xiao-han; Liu, Fei-yu; Xin, Zhao; Jia, Ze-feng (2018). "A preliminary study on the lichen genus Coenogonium from China". Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany. 26 (4): 421–428. doi:10.11926/jtsb.3880.